The committee suggested that no social media platform should be allowed to operate in India unless the parent company sets up a local office. The changes it has proposed to the Bill include classifying social media platforms as significant data fiduciary.
STALIN TELUGU MOVIE HD ONLINE VERIFICATION
"Once application for verification is submitted with necessary documents, the social media intermediaries must mandatorily verify the account," said the report. "Further, the committee has recommended that a statutory media regulatory authority, on the lines of Press Council of India, may be set up for the regulation of the contents on all such media platforms irrespective of the platform where their content is published, whether online, print or otherwise," it said.Ī mechanism should be devised where social media platforms, which do not act as intermediaries, will be held responsible for the content from unverified accounts on their platforms. The panel recommended that all social media platforms, which do not act as intermediaries, be treated as "publishers" and be held accountable for the content they host. "The committee, considering the immediate need to regulate social media intermediaries have expressed a strong view that these designated intermediaries may be working as publishers of the content in many situations, owing to the fact that they have the ability to select the receiver of the content and also exercise control over the access to any such content hosted by them," the report said. It advocated a mechanism for certification of all digital and Internet of Things (IoT) devices. The panel has also favoured a framework to regulate hardware manufacturers who also collect data along with the software. The committee's report made it clear that "India may no more leave its data to be governed by any other country". "The committee opined that it is imperative to store data in India and to restrict access to it by categorising them as sensitive and critical personal data, thus giving impetus to data localisation," the report said. The committee in its report observed that since India has become a big consumer market, there is a large collection, processing and storage of data happening daily. The key takeaways from the report include widening the scope of the draft legislation to also cover non-personal data, tighter regulation for social media platforms along with establishment of a statutory media regulatory authority on the lines of Press Council of India. The 30-member Joint Committee on Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, headed by BJP MP P P Chaudhary, tabled its report in both the houses on Thursday. Privacy advocates have been opposing the said provision, and some Opposition members of Parliament (MPs) too had flagged concerns through their dissent notes. The report, however, did not recommend any major dilution of the contentious exemption clause, which gives powers to the government to keep any of its agencies outside the purview of the data protection legislation. It weakens user rights by carving exceptions for complying with user requests by data fiduciaries,” says Internet Freedom Foundation.Īccording to Chaudhary, who is also the chairperson of the panel, when it comes to sovereignty and integrity of the nation, the government can authorise any agency to process personal data. “While recommending that service shan’t be denied to users for want of conset, the report allows for non-consensual processing of data without necessary safeguards.
Many panel members from Opposition parties have given dissent notes on Clause 35 of the proposed law, which talks about empowering the Centre and its law enforcing agencies to process data without seeking permission from the individual.Ĭritics say the suggested changes further undermine the objectives of the bill by placing economic and state security interests on the same footing as informational privacy. Notably, the report seeks to widen the scope of the draft legislation by including non-personal data. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh tabled the bill in the Rajya Sabha. It has suggested that no social media platform be allowed to operate in India unless the parent company handling the technology sets up an office in the country. The JPC report calls for tighter regulation for social media platforms by treating them as publishers who will be regulated for the content they host.
0 kommentar(er)
